RICS has just released new research by the University of Cambridge on improving the capacity of the Planning System in England and Wales.
RICS commissioned the authors to carry out this research in 2008 as we wanted to look at the capacity of different regions to deliver on national and regional government policies. RICS also felt it important to explore what current differences exist between regions with regard to planning related issues.
RICS also strongly supports the recommendations of the Killian Pretty review and this research will enable RICS to contribute to planning policy at a regional level in a more targeted way.
Key recommendations from the research included:-
- RICS should work with the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) and others to improve the range of courses available to both practising planners and elected members.
- The status of planning should be improved and RICS should play a significant role in this objective. One possibility is turning the role of Chief Planner in local authorities into a statutory position.
- The development control team should be established as an elite team within planning authorities.
- Informal hearings could form the basis for mediation, especially for smaller applications.
- Paying for pre-application discussions was favourably regarded as it could encourage local authorities to adopt this practice as standard and create some common agreement before applications were submitted.
- A Statement of Technical Common Ground should be agreed at pre-application discussions. This would set out a timetable and introduce proportionality.
- Many developers would be happy for a two-tier system where a faster service was available at a higher price.
- There is a greater need for knowledge transfer between developers, private consultants and local authority planners. Where possible, LPAs should seek to fill current vacancies with suitably qualified developers and private consultants. This would not only bring further expertise to LPAs but would also retain those who have recently been made unemployed within the workforce.
What do you think about these suggestions ?
Either post a comment here or send your views to policy@rics.org