* Denotes a required question

10. Select up to three areas in which you can contribute most strongly*

Use the expertise categories listed on pages 7-9 of the guidance document (PDF)

11. Evidence of relevant competence*

In no more than 400 words, explain how your knowledge and experience meet the project criteria. Include one or two practical examples.

12. Key risks and opportunities*

In no more than 250 words, identify the principal consumer, technical or delivery issues that the proposed standard should address.

13. Relevant professional development*

Identify recent CPD, research, publications, teaching or other professional development relevant to the project.

14. Other professional memberships

Organisation and membership grade, where applicable.

15. Expert groups, committees or standards work

Provide the role, dates, subject, contribution and any resulting publication or standard.

16. Conflicts of interest

Declare any actual, potential or perceived conflict relating to the project, including relevant commercial interests. A declaration will not automatically prevent appointment.

17. Availability and commitment*

Confirm that you can meet the published time commitment and identify any known constraints.

18. Publication of appointment*

Are you willing for RICS to publish your name, professional biography and EG membership status?

19. Alternative contribution*

If not appointed to the core Expert Group, would you be willing to contribute to a consultative or reference group? 

20. Additional comments

Optional; no more than 200 words. 


For further information about how RICS processes your personal information and your rights please see the RICS Privacy Policy