Southeast Asia Awards 2024

Each year, outstanding achievement, teamwork, and companies are recognised across Southeast Asia and 2024 will be no different.

The RICS Awards bestow both local and global recognition. They recognise industry leading achievements and demonstrate the upholding of the highest standards of professionalism and ethics by individuals and teams across the built and natural environments.

The awards create a unique platform to showcase innovations and achievements across Southeast Asia’s built and natural environments, as well as encourage development and advancements within the industry. This year’s awards aim to attract wider participation from the sector, promoting the highest professional standards, pioneering better places to live and work, and creating a force for positive social impact. We look forward to receiving visionary and inspiring nominations this year.

Experts from the judging committee will score each application and the winners will be announced at the Southeast Asia awards ceremony in Singapore in October/November 2024.

If you are considering entering the awards this year, please read the entry criteria below to make sure you are eligible and have the required documents to complete your entry. You can also plan and check the upcoming dates for the RICS Southeast Asia Awards.

The RICS Southeast Asia Awards are open to members and non-members Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam. We welcome all individuals, teams and organisations who meet the criteria of the relevant category to apply for the awards. It is important that all applicants review the entry guidelines and assessment criteria to ensure that their submission meets the necessary requirements.

Understand the categories, criteria and rules of entry
Timeline

Before you begin preparing your submission materials, please be sure to read:

What award categories are available in 2024
What the judging criteria will be for each award
What the entry rules and procedures are for each award

Nominations open	25 March 2024
Nominations close	21 June 2024
Judging period	July/August 2024
Finalists announced	9 September 2024
Winners announced	October/November 2024

Award Categories

Category	Description	Criteria
Agency Team of the Year	This award acknowledges companies, teams and/or consortia demonstrating excellence in providing agency services related to the acquisition, sale, or leasing of properties in the office, retail, industrial or residential sectors.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Facilities Management Team of the Year	Awarded to a company, team or consortia responsible for the delivery of outstanding facilities management services. These services might ensure functionality, comfort, safety and/or efficiency of the built environment by integrating people, place, process and/or technology. The award is open to facilities management service providers or teams within property owner organisations who are delivering services in-house.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Project Management & Building Consultancy Team of the Year	Focusing on excellence in the project management and building consultancy industry, the Project Management & Building Consultancy Team of the Year award recognises teams who have undertaken a significant project(s) including but not limited to building surveying, technical due diligence, makegood, project management, etc.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Property Management Team of the Year	Awarded to a company, team or consortia responsible for outstanding tenant relationship management, financial management and asset management. Nominated team may be a service provider or the inhouse team of a property owner.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Quantity Surveying Team of the Year	Celebrating the success of quantity surveyors, this award recognises teams engaged in outstanding quantity surveying projects including but not limited to cost planning, tax depreciation, and contract management.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Research Team of the Year	Acknowledging teams, consultancies, academic institutions and agencies responsible for engaging in research projects associated with the built environment.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Valuation Team of the Year	This award recognises teams involved in valuation services which uphold international standards and give confidence to end-users for their objectivity, independence and reliability on both commercial and/or residential projects.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%

Category	Description	Criteria
Construction Professional of the Year	Presented to an outstanding individual for excellence in quantity surveying, project management, land or building surveying or building control. The Construction Professional of the Year award recognises achievement in construction projects during 2023. The successful candidate will demonstrate how their work has combined the highest professional, ethical and industry standards to deliver superior results and outcomes for clients and stakeholders.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Emerging Achiever of the Year	The future of our profession rests on the shoulders of emerging professionals. The Emerging Achiever Award acknowledges one outstanding individual who has achieved excellence in their field. The individual selected will embody the highest standards of professionalism, be a role-model for their peers and be capable of making an outstanding contribution to the profession over the course of their future career.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Property Professional of the Year	Presented to an outstanding individual involved in property management, facilities management, valuation or acquiring/selling or leasing a commercial, industrial or retail property. The Property Professional of the Year award recognises achievement in property projects during 2023. The selected professional will represent the highest professional ethics, demonstrate their use of standards in their day to day activities and embody the excellence expected of the recipient of such a prestigious award.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Woman of the Built Environment Award	The Woman of the Built Environment Award recognises the outstanding contributions and achievements of senior women to our industry. The award celebrates inspirational role models to inspire the next generation of diverse professionals. Women from all disciplines of the industry are encouraged to enter.	Professionalism 20% Teamwork / Collaboration 20% Outcome and Achievement 20% Thought Innovation 20% Sustainability 20%
Lifetime Achievement Award	Recognising commitment to RICS and the wider profession, the Lifetime Achievement Award is the most prestigious award for built environment professionals. The presentation of this award is subject to the determination of the judging panel that the recipient is worthy of this significant honour.	RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Assessment criteria

Professionalism	Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability, and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable). Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes. Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets among members of the team and with stakeholders. A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion within the firm/team and their work. How does the firm/team embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession? Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes. RICS Standards adopted.
Outcome and Achievement	Realisation of revenue against a predefined target. Client satisfaction (demonstrated through third party endorsements as appropriate). What projects has the team successfully delivered in the previous calendar year? Detailing of challenges overcome in any process relative to complexity e.g. what were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Team demonstrates best practices in appropriate profession (building surveying, valuation, facilities management etc). What steps have been taken to ensure the building’s future resilience?
Thought Innovation	Was an innovative approach used to deliver an outcome? What was this approach (technology, planning, procurement, construction) and why was this used over more conventional solutions? How is the firm/team delivering an innovative approach which embraces new technologies? Innovation in financing and viability. Are innovative strategies embedded on projects or tasks that deliver a social impact? Level of creativity in overcoming challenges. How has the firm/team demonstrated resilience and adaptability?
Sustainability	Does the team demonstrate the adoption of sustainability principles? e.g. climate change mitigation and adaptation, waste reduction, biodiversity conservation, social value creation. Have the sustainability achievements of the team been quantified in numerical terms? Environmental impact: Does the team make efforts to measure and reduce the carbon emissions of its projects? Does the team make efforts to quantify and improve the biodiversity impact of its projects? Social Impact: Does the team engage meaningfully with the communities impacted by its projects? Does the team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability? Health and Well-being: How has the team actively contributed to people’s health and well-being?

Construction Professional of the Year

Professionalism	Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable). Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes. Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets among team members and with stakeholders. Demonstration of change management process and minimising disruption. Resources optimisation. How were resources effectively pulled and utilised to overcome the identified challenges and difficulties against a predefined target? Demonstration of commitment to diversity and inclusion of team or project team will be highly regarded.
Outcome and Achievement	Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target. Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact. Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time. How was disruption to the 'neighbours' minimised? Submission of letter of commendation will be highly regarded.
Thought Innovation	Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome? Was any innovative outcome generated? How was technology applied to deliver the outcome? Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?
Sustainability	Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles. Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

Property Professional of the Year

Professionalism	Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable). Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes. Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets among team members and with stakeholders. Demonstration of change management process and minimising disruption. Resources optimisation. How were resources effectively pulled and utilised to overcome the identified challenges and difficulties against a predefined target? Demonstration of commitment to diversity and inclusion of team or project team will be highly regarded.
Outcome and Achievement	Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target. Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact. Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time. How was disruption to the 'neighbours' minimised? Submission of letter of commendation will be highly regarded.
Thought Innovation	Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome? Was any innovative outcome generated? How was technology applied to deliver the outcome? Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?
Sustainability	Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles. Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

Woman of the Built Environment Award

Professionalism	Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable). Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes. Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets among team members and with stakeholders. Demonstration of change management process and minimising disruption. Resources optimisation. How were resources effectively pulled and utilised to overcome the identified challenges and difficulties against a predefined target? Demonstration of commitment to diversity and inclusion of team or project team will be highly regarded.
Outcome and Achievement	Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target. Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact. Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time. How was disruption to the 'neighbours' minimised? Submission of letter of commendation will be highly regarded.
Thought Innovation	Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome? Was any innovative outcome generated?  How was technology applied to deliver the outcome? Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?
Sustainability	Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles. Social Impact. How did the nominated team promote and educate stakeholders about sustainability in the community and improve the community more broadly?

Lifetime Achievement Award

Assessed on individual merit

RICS will provide recommendation(s) on the worthy recipient for the judging panel’s consideration.

Have they contributed significantly to the profession? How?

Have they contributed significantly to RICS? How?

What have they done for the future of the profession?

How have they displayed exemplary professionalism throughout their career?

Emerging Achiever of the Year

Professionalism	Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical, financial, legal, environmental, building regulation, sustainability and restoration where applicable, to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Demonstration of using the most appropriate procurement method for engaging contractors and suppliers (if applicable). Demonstration of the ability to resolve disputes. Demonstration of how international standards have been adopted will be an advantage.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets and with stakeholders. A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion and their work. How does the individual embrace diversity and contribute to a more inclusive profession? Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes. RICS Standards adopted.
Outcome and Achievement	Measurable success of nominated initiative(s)/project(s)/team(s) against a predefined target. Challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity. What were the or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Cost effectiveness. How was cost managed effectively against a target? Client satisfaction and positive social impact. Timely completion. Demonstration of how the project is managed effectively with respect to time. How was disruption to the 'neighbours' minimised? Submission of letter(s) of commendation will be highly regarded.
Thought Innovation	Was an innovative approach used to deliver the outcome? Was any innovative outcome generated? How was technology applied to deliver the outcome? Any innovative technology applied to enhance site safety (if applicable)? Any smart information technology applied for document control and communication to enhance productivity?
Sustainability	Quantitative analysis on sustainability considerations and achievements. Demonstration of creating better places and spaces for future generations. Demonstrated adoption of sustainable development principles.

Environmental Impact Award

Professionalism	Recognised third party endorsements of the project as professionally outstanding. Use of surveying knowledge and/or professional expertise in areas such as technical competence, finance, legal, environment, and sustainability to achieve outcomes. Demonstrated adherence to RICS ethics. Adoption of international standards will be an advantage but is not essential.
Teamwork / Collaboration	Effective coordination of skillsets among members of the team and with stakeholders. A demonstrated commitment to diversity and inclusion in the delivery of the project(s). Contribution of the surveyor to social outcomes. RICS Standards deployed on the project.
Outcome and Achievement	Realisation of nominated project against a predefined target. Detailing of challenges overcome in the process relative to complexity e.g. What were the difficulties or unique challenges? How were these challenges overcome? Cost effectiveness: how was cost managed against a predefined target? Client satisfaction (demonstrated through third party endorsements as appropriate). Project demonstrates best practices in appropriate profession (property, building surveying, facilities management, etc).
Thought Innovation	Are innovative approaches used to deliver outcomes? Is technology embraced within the team? Innovation in financing and viability. New approaches in the planning, procurement, construction, delivery or outcome measurements on projects. Are innovative strategies embedded on projects that deliver a social impact? Level of creativity in overcoming challenges.
Sustainability	How does the project demonstrate the highest commitment to sustainability? Has the environmental impact of the project been evaluated though an established methodology? (e.g. lifecycle assessment) Was any relevant certification achieved? How does the project address the following categories of environmental sustainability? Climate change mitigation (i.e. carbon reductions) Were the carbon emissions (embodied and/or operational) of the project (or the associated asset) measured and reduced? How does the carbon footprint of the project compare to conventional practices? Climate change adaptation How does the project increase asset resilience to climate change (e.g. extreme weather events)? How does the project increase resilience to climate change? Resource efficiency and circular economy Were efforts made to reduce resource use in comparison to conventional practices? e.g. material recovery/reuse Were efforts made to ensure future activities (e.g. building demolition) can contribute to a circular economy? (e.g. design for deconstruction) Air, water and soil pollution Did the project minimise (or reverse) the emission of pollutants to air, water and soil? Biodiversity Did the project create the right conditions to increase the biodiversity of the local area? Water use Were efforts made to quantify and reduce (fresh)water use? Land use Did the project deliver a change in land use that resulted in a positive environmental impact?

Each submission must be accompanied by specific submission materials, which will be reviewed by the judges.

Nomination will be accepted only upon acknowledgement of nomination materials.

Your submission should include:

Region and Category you are submitting for.
Nominator and Nominee contact details.
Main body of nomination – this should clearly explain the project, demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria and show a commitment to professionalism and ethics (showcasing at least 1 but no more than 3 projects that the team/individual has worked on). This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award. Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation and sustainability). Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.
Up to 3 testimonials (1 page each, PDF upload). For Individual Award categories, at least 1 testimonial must be supplied.
At least one photograph of the nominated team/individual and up to 5 additional photographs of the nominated team/individual and/or project(s) referenced in the submission.
For Individual Award categories, a short video of the Nominee must be supplied (maximum of 2 minutes). This video should introduce the Nominee to the judges, highlighting their achievements and personality.
Up to 3 pieces of other appropriate supporting material, such as technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, videos, etc. (Maximum of 4 pages per piece of supporting material).
Your company logo.
A 100-word summary of the nomination for marketing purposes – what the project was and how the team/individual has showcased excellence (free text section within the form).
For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category, the Nominee’s full CV with references must be supplied to verify eligibility.

Your submission should clearly explain the project, team or individual and demonstrate a connection to the judging criteria, highlighting a commitment to professionalism and ethics. This is where you want to make it clear to the judges exactly why your submission is deserving of the award.

Please note that this will not be a PDF upload, you will need to complete free text sections within the online form, including an introduction and responses to each applicable element of the judging criteria (professionalism, outcome and achievement, teamwork, innovation, and sustainability).

Word limits have been applied to each free text box in accordance with the criteria weighting. We recommend drafting your responses within a word document and then copying and pasting them into the online submission form.

Team and company awards

1. Nominated project(s) and major/key team member(s) must be located or operated in the Awards region being submitted for. The Southeast Asia Awards are open to teams from Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam.

2. Nominations can be made by the nominee (team, company or consortia) or a third party.

3. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed.

4. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three projects within the calendar year (nominating party to select).

5. A company may submit a maximum of 2 nominations within the same category (including joint nominations). Each nomination must be for a separate team and project.

6. A company may submit a joint nomination however, where a joint nomination is submitted a subsequent, stand-alone application from the same company, on the same project(s) and in the same category is not allowed.

7. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission platform. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission will need to be completed for each nomination.

8. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes.

9. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and three testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

10. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the team or individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

11. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

12. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable.

13. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be awarded a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Individual awards

1. Nominated individual must be currently located/operating/have worked in the Awards region being submitted for. The South Asia Awards are open to members and non-members from Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste and Vietnam.

2. The project(s) which is the subject of the nomination must have been worked on within the 2023 calendar year, though not necessarily completed. However, submissions for the Woman of the Built Environment Award and Emerging Achiever Award can reference achievements throughout the nominee’s entire career.

3. Nominations must be based on at least one but no more than three project(s) (nominating party to select).

4. Nominations must be submitted via the online submission form. Where multiple nominations are being submitted by the one organisation, a separate online submission form will need to be completed for each nomination.

5. Nomination must be accompanied by a 100-word summary for marketing purposes.

6. Nomination must be accompanied by at least 1 testimonial from a client, colleague or peer. (Testimonials should be in PDF format.)

7. Nomination must be accompanied by a short video of the nominee (maximum 2 minutes).

8. Other relevant supporting materials/documents are optional but welcomed. These should be limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of supporting material/documents and two additional testimonials. (Documents and testimonials should be in PDF format.)

9. A logo must be provided as well as a photo of the individual nominated. This will be used for marketing purposes and during award presentations.

10. Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

11. The jury panel’s decision on eligibility of the nominations shall be final and is non appealable.

12. Any category which receives less than 2 nominations will not be able to award a winner, exceptions made at the Judge’s discretion.

Emerging Achiever of the Year Award

1. In addition to the individual award criteria, the Emerging Achiever of the Year must have less than 10 years professional experience working in the built and/or natural environments to be eligible.

2. Nomination must be accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.

An online submission is completed for each nomination.
For team awards, at least one but no more than three projects have been included in the nomination.
For team awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the team/individuals nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use) and includes a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
For individual awards, the nomination is accompanied by at least 1 photograph of the individual nominated (for marketing use), a 100-word summary of the nomination (for marketing use), at least 1 testimonial, a short introductory video of the nominee (max 2 mins) and a copy of the nominee’s company logo (as appropriate).
For the Emerging Achiever of the Year category only, the nomination is accompanied by the Nominee’s full CV with references, to verify eligibility.
Supporting material may include testimonials, photographs, technical documentation, media clippings, floor plans, etc. to support the adjudication process.
Supporting material is limited to a maximum of five additional photographs, three additional pieces of relevant material/documents and three testimonials.
Confidential information is clearly labelled ‘RICS Awards in Confidence’.

Privacy

Information provided within the submission may be used by RICS for the purpose of the judging or promotion of the Awards. Any confidential information must be clearly stated within the submission.

We will use the information you provide to contact you in relation to the Awards. You can ask us to stop contacting you at any time by emailing us at awards@rics.org Further details of how we use, hold and store your information, and your legal rights, can be found in our Privacy Policy.

Terms and Conditions

Judges will exclude any submissions that are not completed in full.

The closing date for entries is 21/06/2024 however RICS reserves the right to extend the deadline.

The judges’ decision is final, and awards will be made at their discretion.

Judges reserve the right to move a project into another category if they feel it would better fit the criteria.

We regret that feedback cannot be provided on individual entries.

RICS reserves the right to use photographs and content of entries for PR and publicity purpose. By entering your images and information as part of your submission for the RICS Awards you agree to grant RICS or any third-party we deem suitable worldwide, non-exclusive, unlimited right to use, publish and print in any media.

Entrants will be deemed to have accepted these rules and procedures along with the terms and conditions and to have agreed to be bound by them when entering this competition.

By entering you are agreeing to be contacted by RICS with details of the RICS Awards.

It is the responsibility of the entrant to establish that there are no restrictions or reasons the project cannot be entered and that all interested parties have been contacted and are aware of the entry.

To help us manage and maintain the reputation of the RICS Awards you must inform us about any negative media stories relating to the entry that have occurred during the 12 months preceding the awards ceremony. Negative publicity does not necessarily mean that your entry will be disallowed; however, if it is not disclosed your entry may be disqualified.

Entrants warrant RICS that it has the full and exclusive right to present their credentials (e.g. “Surveyor”) as such. RICS accepts these credentials in good faith and cannot verify that they are correct. Accordingly, any dispute regarding entrants’ credentials must be dealt with between the parties concerned and not with RICS.

Why Participate?

For you:

Garner widespread industry acknowledgment and elevate your personal profile.
Become a role model for the profession.
Enhance your career prospects.
Influence the future of the profession through content creation and conference engagement.

For your firm:

Boost team morale and recognise exceptional staff.
Showcase your brand's distinction among competitors.
Attract remarkable talent and investment.

For your colleague:

As well as individuals entering, nominations are welcome from employers, clients, or peers for those championing the role of a surveyor.  Employers could incorporate these awards as part of their recognition schemes, by highlighting employees within the firm, as well as externally, those who are going above and beyond within their roles. Those nominating do not need to be members of RICS themselves but must know the individual and their achievements well.

Submit your nomination

By clicking the “Submit your nomination” button, you will be directed to complete the online submission form and upload your supporting materials online.

Submission materials must be received by COB Friday 21 June 2024.

For any enquiries regarding the Awards, submissions or sponsorship opportunities, please contact awards@rics.org